Are you a NEM 1.0 Customer Without a Battery? It is Time to Take Action

Are you a proud solar owner in the Bay Area, California, benefiting from the Net Energy Metering (NEM) 1.0 rate plan with PG&E? If so, you may have heard about the transition to NEM 2.0 and now NEM 3.0. Understanding these changes is crucial for making informed decisions about your solar investment.

In this guide, we’ll walk through how each NEM plan works and why customers under NEM 1.0 may start losing value when transitioning to Time-of-Use (TOU) electricity plans.

Understanding NEM 1.0, NEM 2.0, and NEM 3.0 in California

Net Energy Metering 1.0, introduced in the early 2000s, played a major role in accelerating solar adoption in California. Under NEM 1.0, homeowners received full retail credit for every excess kilowatt-hour (kWh) exported to the grid.

This meant you could generate more energy during the day and use those credits later at night. In effect, the grid acted like a virtual battery, making solar highly efficient from a financial standpoint.

Over time, however, policies evolved. Utilities needed to balance grid costs, infrastructure demands, and increasing solar adoption. This led to the introduction of NEM 2.0 and eventually NEM 3.0.

Under NEM 3.0, export compensation has dropped significantly. Instead of receiving full retail credit, homeowners now receive rates closer to wholesale pricing. This shift changes how solar systems generate savings and makes energy usage timing far more important.

Comparison of NEM Policies

Retail CreditFull retail creditReduced retail creditSignificantly reduced (near wholesale)
True-Up PeriodAnnualAnnualAnnual
TOU RatesOptional / FlatMandatoryMandatory
Grandfathering20 years20 years15 years

The Impact of Time-of-Use (TOU) Rates on NEM 1.0 Customers

One of the biggest changes in newer NEM policies is the shift to Time-of-Use pricing. Under TOU plans, electricity prices vary throughout the day, with higher rates during peak demand hours.

This creates a challenge for solar users. Solar panels produce the most energy during the day, when electricity rates are lower. However, households typically consume more energy in the evening, when rates are higher.

As a result, homeowners who were previously maximizing savings under NEM 1.0 may begin to see reduced financial benefits. The issue is not lower production-it is the mismatch between when energy is generated and when it is used.

Real Example: How TOU Reduces Solar Value

The chart above highlights a real-world scenario from a PG&E customer.

In 2022, the homeowner exported 178 kWh and received approximately $176.67 in credits. This equates to nearly $1 per kWh under favorable conditions.

After transitioning to a TOU plan in 2023, the same homeowner exported almost double the energy. However, the total credit dropped to $116.17, or about $0.36 per kWh.

This represents a loss of roughly 64% in value, even though more energy was produced.

Why Solar Alone Is No Longer Enough in California

In the past, solar panels alone were sufficient to significantly reduce electricity bills. Today, that is no longer the case.

With reduced export credits and TOU pricing, the focus has shifted from generating energy to using it efficiently. Homeowners exploring solar panel and battery installation in California are increasingly looking at storage solutions to improve self-consumption.

Without a battery, excess energy is often sold at a lower rate. Later, electricity must be purchased back from the grid at a higher price. This reduces overall savings and limits the effectiveness of solar systems.

How a Battery Helps Reduce TOU Losses

A battery system stores excess solar energy during the day and allows you to use it during peak hours. This process, known as energy shifting, helps align energy usage with higher electricity rates.

Instead of exporting energy at a lower value, homeowners can store it and use it when it matters most. This improves savings and reduces reliance on grid electricity during expensive periods.

In the example above, adding battery storage helped reduce the financial impact of TOU pricing. The loss dropped from approximately 64% to around 20%, demonstrating how storage can improve system performance.

Homeowners considering home battery storage installation in the Bay Area are increasingly adopting this approach to maintain long-term savings.

Best Battery Options for Bay Area Homeowners

Choosing the right battery depends on your energy usage, backup requirements, and system design.

Systems like the Tesla Powerwall provide an integrated solution that combines storage, backup power, and energy management. These systems are designed to work efficiently under TOU pricing and help optimize solar usage.

Working with a Tesla-certified installer in the Bay Area, California, ensures that the system is installed correctly and configured for maximum performance.

How to Choose the Right Solar Installer in the Bay Area

Selecting the right installer is one of the most important decisions in the process. Many homeowners compare solar installation companies near the Bay Area, but not all installers offer the same level of expertise.

An experienced solar installer in the Bay Area will:

  • Analyze your energy usage.
  • Design a system based on TOU optimization.
  • Ensure proper installation and configuration.

Working with a trusted provider like Nabu Energy helps ensure that your system is designed not just for installation, but for long-term performance.

What Should You Do Next as a NEM 1.0 Customer?

If you are currently under NEM 1.0, this is the right time to evaluate how future rate changes may impact your savings.

Start by reviewing your energy usage patterns and identifying how much electricity you consume during peak hours. Understanding this will help determine whether adding battery storage can improve your system’s performance.

Homeowners exploring solar installation near the Bay Area should also consider working with a qualified residential solar installer in the Bay Area who understands both solar and battery integration. Proper system design is essential for maximizing long-term value.

Conclusion

The transition from NEM 1.0 to newer policies has changed how solar systems deliver financial benefits. While earlier systems relied heavily on export credits, today’s environment requires a more strategic approach to energy usage.

By combining solar with battery storage, homeowners can better align energy production with consumption. This helps maintain savings, improve reliability, and adapt to evolving utility rate structures.

For homeowners in California, the key is not just installing solar-it is ensuring the system is designed and optimized for how energy is used today.